Post by Jeremy and Ilanah:
The IPKat notes that this is the first example of piracy having an effect on downstream rental markets he has come across. Usually, the argument against piracy is made by the artists themselves or by recording companies.
More Asian pirates here and here
BLOCKBUSTER EXPANSION BLOCKED BY PIRATES
![BLOCKBUSTER EXPANSION BLOCKED BY PIRATES]()
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Sunday, February 01, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] The UK’s AI and copyright consultation – will data protection law render any commercial TDM exception ineffective?](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjbUiGfTD43fEv8X8tQGvijKMJMnDC6oSPVCTILFF64TOPyIhkSFkt28Coa7C0bu4UGcLvN0T2Xz1xLNNxrlG5jgQRdf1NS67AZu9o6gzC8V0m-LCdkYfN8MJT5bIYojtxFLV-DUfhzuYGuB-jwT5qyaVNBpFFX4VK7-7301078eEuxEJ7rDqpkbg/s150/istock-1135379026_unrestricted_1110x800_0.webp)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html