Frozen food brand Birds Eye is scrapping its famous gull-shaped logo, The Scotsman reports that parent company Unilever is replacing the bird design with a new eye-shaped logo as part of the biggest overhaul of the brand since it first hit the British freezer market in 1938. The first products carrying the new logo are set to appear in April. Jerry Wright, brand director for Birds Eye, said: "You muck about with the old logo at your peril. You have to have something better in place but we believe we have that".
The IPKat, ever interested in birds, quite fancies moving in on the old gull-shaped logo and using it commercially himself once Unilever hasn't used it for five years. He wonders whether the giant food corporation will be taken the necessary precautions (if indeed there are any possible precautions) to prevent him doing so.
Find out here why the brand is called Birds Eye
Raging at the missing apostrophe in Birds Eye? Click here for consolation
More on birds' eyes here, here and here
Birdseyes here and here
Classic bird's eye joke here (scroll down to joke number 16)
The IPKat, ever interested in birds, quite fancies moving in on the old gull-shaped logo and using it commercially himself once Unilever hasn't used it for five years. He wonders whether the giant food corporation will be taken the necessary precautions (if indeed there are any possible precautions) to prevent him doing so.
Find out here why the brand is called Birds Eye
Raging at the missing apostrophe in Birds Eye? Click here for consolation
More on birds' eyes here, here and here
Birdseyes here and here
Classic bird's eye joke here (scroll down to joke number 16)
A BIRD IN THE HAND ISN'T WORTH TWO IN THE BUSH FOR BIRDS EYE
![A BIRD IN THE HAND ISN'T WORTH TWO IN THE BUSH FOR BIRDS EYE]()
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] EUIPO Second Board of Appeal refers case to Grand Board of Appeal following earlier refusal to register a photograph of a man’s head/face as an EU trade mark](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiUj9v-k3DYaSVMR4lsmKDLHVB5nIoINuvZNbH2TQCelrfaAE9qmGSAQs-plzQ7HnZ7Svk_gRdrIODp0Nat5vpWajduit3xkArNhK76AHhX770RIJ62thfCVI5fnvcXU-5zH4NkUSfPY9FjRMFiK7OKJ7m7YSo2FzhyPSoA8ZWCsxaOXb0bBCoPQA/s72-c/Picture%201.png)
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html