Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!
The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!
The team is joined by GuestKats Söğüt Atilla, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Oliver Fairhurst and Marcel Pemsel.
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Anastasiia Kyrylenko (Book Review Editor).
In a recent opposition before the UK Trade Marks Registry brought by the fashion designer Elizabeth Emanuel, the Lord Chancellor's Appointed Person (LCAP), David Kitchen QC, has stated his intention to refer various questions that arose in the course of the opposition to the European Court of Justice. To the IPKat's knowledge, this is the first time that an LCAP has made an Article 234 reference. More usually, when such a difficult legal issue arises, the LCAP will refer the case to the High Court, which will refer the question to the ECJ if necessary. However, the LCAP failed to do so in this case because moving the case to the High Court may have made it too expensive for the opponent to pursue and he had hoped that the case could be resolved on the facts without need for any further hearing.
The LCAP hears appeals from the Trade Mark Registry. No appeal lies from cases before the LCAP unless he choses to stay the case and refer it to the High Court.
LCAP MAKES REFERENCE TO THE ECJ
Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo
on
Wednesday, February 25, 2004
Rating: 5
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
The IPKat: Intellectual Property News and Fun for Everyone!
How many page-views has the IPKat received?
94,234,499
Not just any old IPKat ...
* "Most Popular Intellectual Property Law Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, March 2025.
* "Most Popular Copyright Blawg" of all time according to Justia rankings, March 2025.
* "Best UK Intellectual Property blog" of all time according to FeedSpot, March 2025.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati has been quoted, and the IPKat has also been hyperlinked on the New York Times, April 2024.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati and The IPKat are expressly recommended as sources to follow to get an "unstuffy look at IP issues" according to Legal Business, April 2023.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosati listed as one of the World Intellectual Property Review's "Influential Women in IP" of 2020.
* PermaKat Eleonora Rosatilisted as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2018.
* IPKat founder and Blogmeister Emeritus Jeremy Phillips listed as one of the Managing Intellectual Property magazine's "Fifty Most Influential People" of 2005, 2011, 2013, and 2014.
* Recommended by the European Patent Office as reading material for candidates for the European Qualifying Examinations, 2013.
* Listed as "Top Legal Blog" in The Times Online, March 2011.
* One of the only two non-US blogs listed in the Blawg 2010 ABA Journal100.
* Court Reporter Top Copyright Blog award winner, November 2010.
* Number 1 in the 2010 Top Copyright Blog list compiled by the Copyright Litigation Blog, July 2010.
* Selected by the United States Library of Congress for inclusion in its historic collections of Internet materials related to Legal Blawgs as of 2010.
* Top Patent Blog poll 2009: 3rd out of 50 in the "Favourite Patent Blog" poll and 2nd out of 50 in the "Most-read" poll.
* ComputerWeekly IT Law and Governance Blog of the Year, 20 August 2008.
* Best of the Blogs, Times Online, 21 August 2008.
Get the Kat in your Inbox!
Over 16,400 readers already subscribe to the IPKat by email.
To subscribeclick here and enter your preferred e-mail address.
Any problems, please let the IPKat team know.
The Kat that tweets! Current followers: 22.6K
To follow the IPKat team's posts and comments on X (formerly Twitter), just click here Follow @Ipkat
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html