HP, INTERGRAPH SETTLE - AT A PRICE


The Register reports that Palo Alto-based hardware manufacturer Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP) has agreed to pay $141 million (108.5 million euro) to settle its patent disputes with software maker Intergraph Corp. of Huntsville, Alabama. The companies issued separate statements to the effect that (i) they will immediately dismiss, withdraw or terminate all pending lawsuits; (ii) while reserving the right to reinstate them; (iii) HP gets licences to all Intergraph patents while (iv) Intergraph is licensed to use all HP patents in fields covered by its current products.

Intergraph sued in 2002 claiming that Hewlett-Packard, Dell Inc. and Gateway Inc. infringed patents related to its systems using Intel Corp. chips. Related settlements were reached last year with Intel, Dell and Gateway. Palo Alto-based Hewlett-Packard had been in litigation with Intergraph in both U.S. federal court and in the European Union. Intergraph said it would record about $11 million in legal expenses for the first quarter of 2005 to offset the settlement. Said Intergraph CEO and President Halsey Wise:
"We believe that the settlement with HP is in the best interest of our shareholders, and we are pleased to have received a license to HP's extensive patent portfolio for our fields of business".
Intergraph, which has more than 3,000 employees in 60 countries, specialises in graphics software to make maps, build and operate factories and ships, dispatch emergency service and manage infrastructure.

Invent: can be a less attractive commercial alternative to "infringe"

It seems to the IPKat that one of the best ways for a company to make money is to ensure that only the richest and moast successful companies infringe its patents.
HP, INTERGRAPH SETTLE - AT A PRICE HP, INTERGRAPH SETTLE  -  AT A PRICE Reviewed by Jeremy on Saturday, January 22, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Excellent obsevation, Jeremy.
    I wonder which one is the real Intergraph, the "infringed on" or the "infringer".
    Several years ago Integraph acquired the royalties to INtools, an instrumentation engineering software suite. However, it seems that they play wise guys and evade paying to the fullest what they contracted for.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.