Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / JANUARY 2005 PATENT OF THE MONTH: FABULOUS FEATHERS

JANUARY 2005 PATENT OF THE MONTH: FABULOUS FEATHERS

Watch the birdie!

Is the blue bird of happiness just a little too happy for your liking? Do avian projectile missiles project in your direction just a little too often? This the IPKat’s January 2005 Patent of the Month (sourced from delpion.com) is for you! The “bird diaper”, which, according to the abstract, is a “bird diaper for an uncaged pet bird to wear, featuring an enclosed pouch for receiving and containing excrement, and apertures to accommodate both the wings and the tail of the bird” should solve all your pigeon poop problems. And the good news for the bird about town is that the diaper can incorporate bright colours and decorative designs.

This, thinks the IPKat, is no bird-brained idea.

Bird diapers here
More links in the best possible taste here, here and here
JANUARY 2005 PATENT OF THE MONTH: FABULOUS FEATHERS JANUARY 2005 PATENT OF THE MONTH: FABULOUS FEATHERS Reviewed by Anonymous on Sunday, January 02, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.