HORSE OR WHORES? TRADE MARK DILUTION TAKES ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH


Here's a nice item from the Louisville Courier-Journal, Kentucky. State officials are threatening to sue Bart McQueary, of Harrodsburg, for his "satirical" use of the state logo on his website. Last November a horse-head graphic and the phrase "Unbridled Spirit" were chosen as the state's brand logo and slogan. McQueary is using the very same logo on his own website, above the slogan "Kentucky: The World's Largest Whorehouse". The executive director of the state Office of Legal Affairs served a Notice of Infringement to McQueary, alleging violation of federal trade mark law. McQueary refuses to remove the logo, saying it's an exercise of his freedom of speech. The graphic can be seen here and here on sites where McQueary articulates his thoughts on adultery, homosexuality and other subjects.

McQueary said the "world's largest whorehouse" is a reference to the state's "high divorce rate, our divorce and remarriage rate, our infidelity rate, teen pregnancy rate." He said the state cannot legally force him to pull the logo because he does not use it for commercial purposes. He adds:
"It's the satirical use of something. You don't have to get permission for a parody".
The final decision on whether to sue McQueary has not yet been taken. American Civil Liberties Union lobbyist Marvin Johnson and New York trade mark attorney David H. Bernstein (Debevoise & Plimpton) both said McQueary has federal law on his side. Says Bernstein:
"What he is doing is not trade mark infringement. People who are familiar with the logo and who know Kentucky know the state is not saying 'Come visit Kentucky, we're a whorehouse'".
Bernstein and Johnson did however say that the state could sue McQueary for "dilution", which is defined as the unauthorised use of a highly distinctive mark in a way that tends to blur its distinctiveness or tarnishes its image. But the chances that the state would win are slim, they said.

The IPKat looks forward to some sparkling debate on the interface between federal trade mark dilution and freedom of speech. Merpel adds, "McQueary's comments on the citizens of Kentucky give a whole new meaning to the word 'damn-nation'".

More Unbridled Spirits here, here and here
HORSE OR WHORES? TRADE MARK DILUTION TAKES ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH HORSE OR WHORES? TRADE MARK DILUTION TAKES ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH Reviewed by Jeremy on Sunday, March 06, 2005 Rating: 5

8 comments:

  1. Horse racing tips for professional lay bettingracing

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yo, This blog is pretty neat. You should check out mine sometime. It pretty much covers b2c email marketing related stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a direct free list mailing site/blog. It pretty much covers direct free list mailing related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!

    I have a marketing and advertising site/blog. It pretty much covers marketing and advertising related stuff.

    Come and check it out if you get time :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Would The Thought Of Thousands Of Other Web Site's All Displaying Your Content,

    ReplyDelete
  6. Can I tell your readers about good advertising on affordable email marketing Very thought provoking ideas in your blog.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
    Nokota

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.