LEGALITY OF UK DESIGN LAW: ANIMAL v OAKLEY UPDATE


The IPKat has learned that Peter Prescott QC has issued a supplementary decision to his judgment in Animal v Oakley, a case concerning the constitutionality of the UK design system. It seems that he didn't mean what people think that he meant. More when the decision becomes available.

The IPKat says, watch this space...
LEGALITY OF UK DESIGN LAW: ANIMAL v OAKLEY UPDATE LEGALITY OF UK DESIGN LAW: ANIMAL v OAKLEY UPDATE Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, March 17, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.