VACCINE NAMES CAUSE CONFUSION


The IPKat is grateful to Ed Meikle for pointing out this article from the BBC. 93 teenage pupils at a school in Carlisle received an incorrect vaccine as a result of an incorrect order being placed with the manufacturers. Following a flood which destroyed the original stock of vaccines, any emergency order was placed by telephone. However, instead of obtaining REVAXIS, which contains Diphtheria, Tetanus and Polio vaccines, the health authority ended up with REPEVAX, which contains the same combination and a whooping cough vaccine that is aimed at under-fives. Luckily, the additional vaccine was not harmful. Both vaccines are produced by Aventis Pasteur MSD.


The IPKat says that this goes to show how, in cases where the goods are ordered by telephone, the aural element of the marks in question can be crucial. In this case of course, there is no issue of trade mark infringement since both vaccines are made by the same company. The IPKat though is sure that, had the marks been in the hands of different proprietors, this would be a clear case of confusion.

More on the UK’s vaccination programme here.
Do you want to reuse the IPKat content? Please refer to our Policies section. If you have any queries or requests for permission, please get in touch with the IPKat team.
Print | Share by email
By Anonymous at

Comments

Post a Comment

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

← Previous Post Next Post →