Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Jeremy Phillips / FLEA IN ONE'S EAR

FLEA IN ONE'S EAR

-

The iPod flea. What would the Beetles have said?

The IPKat is still chuckling at this highly humorous spoof advertisement, via Adrants, for the iPod Flea, an MP3 player so small that it can play a repertoire of just one song over and over again for an hour. The point is not that it's a funny ad but that, on the assumption that it has not been sanctioned by Apple (and that's a big assumption in the eyes of this suspicious Kat), the best policy for dealing with this unauthorised use of the iconic iPod trade mark is to sit back and laugh at it. Apple would look so very sad if it rushed to court. In any event, can it be seriously maintained that this sort of use -- even if unwanted -- causes any meaningful damage?
More fleas here
Wasps here
Crabs here
Spiders here
FLEA IN ONE'S EAR FLEA IN ONE'S EAR Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, July 11, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousMonday, 11 July 2005 at 23:32:00 GMT+1

    Of course Apple should sue. If you let one guy come along and make a fool of your trade mark, how long will it be before everyone's doing it? Macdonalds might have thought MacJobs wouldn't hurt, but it's a bit of an embarrassment now, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousTuesday, 12 July 2005 at 11:48:00 GMT+1

    Whoever said Apple should sue must surely be a lawyer.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.