Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / COURTING SUCCESS

COURTING SUCCESS


If anyone is looking for entertainment tomorrow, there would be worse places for an IP lawyer to go to than the Royal Courts of Justice:

*In Court 75, judges (including Lord Justice Jacob) will be delivering the Court of Appeal’s judgment in William Hill v British Horseracing Board, a database decision that has been to the ECJ.

*Also in Court 75, Lord Justice Jacob will be hearing the next stage of Hormel Foods Corporation v Antilles Landscape Investments N.V. (the Spam infringement/invalidity case). This time the parties are seeking permission to amend the appellant’s notice and for the defendant to cross-appeal.

*In Court 70, the Court of Appeal (including Lord Justice Neuberger) will be delivering its final decision in La Mer v Goemar, a case on what counts as genuine use as a trade mark that was given short shrift by the ECJ.
The IPKat will use best endeavours to report these judgments to you, as and when they become available to him.
COURTING SUCCESS COURTING SUCCESS Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, July 12, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousSaturday, 29 October 2005 at 11:34:00 GMT+1

    Get 1000s of Links pointing back to Your Site... Starting Today!

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFriday, 4 November 2005 at 13:42:00 GMT

    "No Charge Online Advertising Channels For Any Business"

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.