Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / ANOTHER DOG GONE INVENTION!

ANOTHER DOG GONE INVENTION!

The IPKat’s Patent of the Month for October is the winner of the 2005 IgNoble Prize for medicine. Gregg Miller’s “Surgical method and apparatus for implantation of a testicular prosthetic device” is protected by a US patent. Neuticles (as the subject-matter of this invention are known) allows a neutered dog, cat or horse to “ retain his natural look, self esteem and aids in the trauma associated with neutering”. Invented after Miller realised that his bloodhound, Buck, would be disfigured after neutering, the implants are available in a variety of sizes and degrees of firmness.


The IPKat can’t bear to comment. Merpel wonders who purchases the Neuticles merchandise (including a delightful necklace strung with two Neuticles), available on the Neuticles website…

ANOTHER DOG GONE INVENTION! ANOTHER DOG GONE INVENTION! Reviewed by Anonymous on Saturday, October 08, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousSunday, 30 October 2005 at 15:14:00 GMT

    If you like dog collar you may very well like this site dog collar

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.