Daniel Lee has informed the IPKat of a coffee-flavoured dispute. Starbucks has successfully stopped Sam(antha) Buck of Astoria, Oregon from selling coffee under the name Sambuck’s, even though the device that she used was not similar to the Starbucks logo. The order against Ms Buck was made on the grounds of wilful trade mark infringement and dilution.
The IPKat is feeling quite smug that we have an own name defence in the UK. However, our own name defence involves an obligation on the defendant to use his mark in accordance with honest practices in industrial and commercial matters. Turning a two word name into a single word that resembles a well known trade mark may be seen as taking advantage of that mark, or as being otherwise not in accordance with honest practices.
Do you want to reuse the IPKat content? Please refer to our
Policies section.
If you have any queries or requests for permission, please get in touch with the IPKat team.
Comments
Post a Comment
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html