UNDERSCORE UNDERSCORES TRADE MARK INJUNCTION



The IPKat has sourced this interesting little US trade mark dispute from TMCNet. Perfume Bay has been selling perfumes under the Perfume Bay trade mark and from a website with the perfumebay.com URL. Auction website eBay brought trade mark infringement and dilution cases against Perfume Bay. eBay lost on most of the claims, allowing Perfume Bay to continue using its logo, name and slogan. However, the Central District Court of California found that the perfumebay.com URL was confusing and ordered that Perfume Bay should insert a separator (such as a space or underscore) between the words “perfume” and “bay”. Perfume Bay sought a stay of the injunction because ICANN will not accept domain names containing underscores. The stay was initially granted for 30 days by the District Court in order to enable Perfume Bay to appeal to the Court of Appeals. The appeal court has stayed the injunction until the appeal can be heard in full.

In its original decision, the District Court also appears to have found that eBay had engaged in deceptive advertising, suggesting that there was a link between eBay and Perfume Bay. This allowed Perfume Bay to win on an “unclean hands” defence point

The IPKat thinks that it makes sense to vary an order which is predicated on the possibility of a course of action that cannot be made to happen. He notes though that this is an example of a court modifying its approach to a trade mark issue in the light of ICANN’s rules.
UNDERSCORE UNDERSCORES TRADE MARK INJUNCTION UNDERSCORE UNDERSCORES TRADE MARK INJUNCTION Reviewed by Unknown on Sunday, December 11, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.