The .eu Sunrise Period starts tomorrow, 7 December. Between then and 7 April 2006, only public bodies, holders of EU trade marks, geographical indications and (from 2 February) national rights will be able to apply for domain names ending in the .eu suffix.

It has come to the IPKat’s attention, via the INTA list and chatting to his friends at yesterday’s JIPLP launch party, that various non-EU companies are playing the system in order to ensure that they’re eligible to apply during the sunrise period. The said companies are applying to register trade marks in jurisdictions which will grant trade marks speedily (the Benelux appears to be a favourite – details of how quickly they register marks here) and then using those registrations as proof of eligibility for the Sunrise period.

The IPKat says a loophole perhaps, but one that has been left in the system. Such a rouse would not work if the applications were being made in the UK. It seems unlikely that use to support a domain name application, or even use on the domain name, would count as genuine use. This would mean that the mark would be applied for without genuine intention to use, leaving it open to being either refused or cancelled on bad faith grounds. Merpel adds that this is a nice little money-spinner for those national trade mark offices that are granting the speedy trade marks.

.eu SUNRISE TOMORROW AND HOW TO GET AROUND IT .eu SUNRISE TOMORROW AND HOW TO GET AROUND IT Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, December 06, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. For example, see "Get .EU Domain Names without a European Facility" at http://ip-updates.blogspot.com/2005/11/get-eu-domain-names-without-european.html.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.