The original Mickey Mouse (left) and the cloned version (rights). Scientists and theatre critics claim they are identical and even Ms Mouse is hard-pressed to tell them apart.
A spokesman for Mickey's long-time on- and off-screen partner Minnie welcomed the development. Meanwhile the USPTO has confirmed that Disney's patent attorneys have applied for monopoly protection. The patent claims are for
"1. A method of cloning a non-human mammal, the method comprising the steps of:Meanwhile, lawyers for Looney Tunes' parent company Warner are considering legal action in respect of Claim 4 which, they maintain, is for an extension of the newly-disclosed cloning technology to a fictional character, Sylvester J. Pussycat, Sr., (right) in whom they own the copyright.removing from a physical representation of the mammal body one or more samples comprised within a cel; introducing the one or more samples into a cel replicating machine; preparing in the cel replicating machine one or more new cels comprising a representation of a cloned copy of the mammal,
wherein the replicating machine is configured to alter at least a portion of the representation of the cloned copy of the mammal.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the non-human mammal is of the genus mus.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the non-human mammal is of the species mus musculus.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the non-human mammal is of the species cattus felis silvestris.
5. The method of any preceding claim wherein the non-human mammal is a fictional character".
Great detective work, IPKat.
ReplyDeleteIs the current team of 4 IPKat co-blogmeisters prior art, though?
PS - shame they don't have a dependent claim for Brunus Edwardii