Turnitin sued for copyright infringement; Let's party, says the ORG

"In an ironic twist of fate", reads a note from IPWorld, "anti-plagiarism website Turnitin is being sued by high school students for an alleged violation of copyright laws". The action in question arises from Turnitin’s policy of adding student answer sheets to its database as they are checked for plagiarism.

According to the suit, four students obtained a copyright registration for the papers they submitted to Turnitin and requested that their work was not submitted to the site’s database. They then noticed that this request was ignored and filed suit at a US District Court in Alexandria, seeking $900,000 in damages. Although there are exemptions to copyright law for educational purposes the fact that Turnitin is a for-profit company may be its downfall.

In a jurisdiction in which damages are truly compensatory, says the IPKat, $900,000 looks way too high. Merpel, noting that many academic institutions require students to assign copyright or license it as a condition of registration, wonders whether we'll soon see students being regularly required to license the hand-over of all written assignments for plagiarism-check purposes.

Celebrating World Intellectual Property Day early - or perhaps not actually celebrating it all - is the Open Rights Group, which is preparing to party on Wednesday 11 April at Bar Kick, London. This is a chance for ORG supporters to meet one another: each ORG supporter is requested to bring at least one friend who is perceived as being likely to support ORG if he or she knew more about its work. The event will feature “public domain” music, remixed visuals and free culture goodie bags - truly an evening not to be missed. Details of the event and raffle here. The IPKat doesn't know what to say: although the party is not billed as being Bacchinalian, he wonders if it might just be, well, a little ORG-y ...
Turnitin sued for copyright infringement; Let's party, says the ORG Turnitin sued for copyright infringement; Let's party, says the ORG Reviewed by Jeremy on Monday, April 02, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.