UK Patent Office 2006 review

The UK Patent Office (as was) have published their review of 2006, which is available here (watch out for a big download). To add a bit of interest and colour, the review is subdivided into the four seasons and is
"dedicated to the patented technology used in today’s renewable energy sources, as they protect our future, we protect the hard work of their inventors".

So it looks like, as well as giving themselves a new name, those nice people at the UK-IPO are going all green on us. Perhaps this should be an encouragement to all green technology companies out there to get patenting, if they're not doing so already. Is anyone out there making innovations in wind, solar, geothermal or hydroelectric power? The UKIPO wants you to know they are here to help you protect your future too.

On a more sober note, embedded in the mostly dry "facts and figures" towards the end of the review, the number of patents granted in class G4* apparently fell from 1,144 in 2005 to 662 in 2006. The IPKat wonders why this was. Any ideas?

*"Calculating: counting: checking: signalling: data handling" (under which many computer-implemented inventions will fall)
UK Patent Office 2006 review UK Patent Office 2006 review Reviewed by David Pearce on Monday, April 02, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.