Roland Grossenbacher speaks

Intellectual Property Watch reports that the chairman of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Office has been expressing a few thoughts on the future of the patent system, at a France-Switzerland Chamber of Commerce meeting in Geneva. Catherine Saez of IP Watch writes,

"At the 19 April event, Grossenbacher [...] gave a presentation on the influence of intellectual property on trade policy. He said that the overload of the new system and the increase in developing countries as users of the patent system is good news and will lead, in time, to the reduction of piracy and counterfeiting of goods.

He also said that stricter access to patentability should be instituted, putting an emphasis on quality over quantity, he said. Four factors should be absolute prerequisites for obtaining and granting a patent: Innovation, inventive activity (if outside the realm of the specialist), strict limitations on patentability (avoiding fields for which patents are not applicable, such as software), and a significant decrease in the delays in granting patents.

Grossenbacher advocated for stricter systems for granting patents and a strengthening of patent protection, though he warned against extremes in protection. Too much or too little protection can harm innovation, he said".

The IPKat thinks that we should pay careful attention to what Herr Grossenbacher has to say, since his position is a highly influential one (and will become more so after EPC2000 comes into force). Nothing he says appears too controversial (apart perhaps from the mention of software), but this Kat wonders how the improvements to the system are to be funded. An increase in examination fees, perhaps?
Roland Grossenbacher speaks Roland Grossenbacher speaks Reviewed by David Pearce on Monday, April 23, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.