Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / Canada / Canadian copyright law / copyright / Special 301 / US / Group recommends Special 301 against Canada

Group recommends Special 301 against Canada

- , , , ,

CBC reports that the International Intellectual Property Alliance has filed a report to the US Trade Representative put Canada on the US's priority watch list, together with Russia and China, as the biggest infringer of US intellectual property rights. It argues that Canada has not kept its copyright law up to date with technological developments, nor has it met the minimum standards to the WIPO Copyright Treaties, signed in 1996. Although Canada is in the middle of reforming its copyright, the Group said

"In 2007, parliamentary leadership and the government, at its highest levels, acknowledged many of these deficiencies and the government listed copyright reform among its top legislative priorities. But these encouraging statements have not yet evolved into anything more concrete."

The IPKat speculates that the link between Canada's geographical position and damage to US IPRs must be mere coincidence...
Group recommends Special 301 against Canada Group recommends Special 301 against Canada Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. Howard KnopfWednesday, 13 February 2008 at 17:58:00 GMT

    See this:

    http://excesscopyright.blogspot.com/2008/02/iipa-dmca-and-canadian-copyright.html

    and better still this from Bill Patry:

    http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2008/02/no-one-likes-bully-iipa-and-canada.html

    Howard Knopf

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.