Naked cowboy in win-win situation

Various readers have drawn the IPKat's attention to a Reuters news item concerning New York City street performer Robert Burck, alias "The Naked Cowboy", who is suing Mars Inc for $6 million for misappropriating the use of his trade mark appearance: white underwear, cowboy boots and a hat. The alleged infringement has been performed by a blue M&M confection on a Times Square billboard. Burck objects to the portrayal of a scantily-clad blue M&M with a guitar alongside views of New York, including street scenes and the Statue of Liberty.

The IPKat admires the manner in which publicity-conscious Americans play the intellectual property system for their own benefit. Burck drums up plenty of coverage, enhances his already substantial public profile and even stands to gain a small pay-out in settlement; M&M hog the headlines at the expense of their competitors and gain considerable public sympathy for being subjected to the indignity of litigation in response to their good-humoured parody. Even the lawyers get something to bill for. Merpel adds, I hope it goes to court so we can read the arguments of the respective parties: it would be a pity if the resolution of this little spat was the subject of a cover-up ...

Naked cowboy here
Naked cowgirl here
Naked cowboy in win-win situation Naked cowboy in win-win situation Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 15, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.