London Agreement latest news

The IPKat has learned from Kerry Tomlinson (Frank B. Dehn) that Germany has slightly slipped up in its implementation of the London Agreement: the long-awaited and not uncontroversial deal to dispense with much of the burden of patent translations comes into force four months after the Agreement does. The German Justice Ministry is working to patch this up so that it operates from 1 May 2008. Meanwhile, with the world's eyes glued on France (no, this is nothing to do with President Sarkozy's personal life: see IPKat posts here , here and here), Denmark has quietly deposited its own instrument of ratification. Kerry adds:
"The situation now will be that translations of the claims into the local language will be needed in Croatia, Denmark, Iceland, Latvia, Netherlands, Slovenia, and Sweden (when it deposits), while no translations are needed in France, Germany, Luxembourg, Monaco, Switzerland/Liechtenstein and the United Kingdom.

In about half of these countries the Agreement has made no change to the situation as it pertained before. This applies to EP applications filed in English, the situation is slightly different if filed in French or German in that a translation of the description into English may be required.

Interestingly in the UK, patents granted at least back to 1 December 2007 will be covered as a two months extension of time is available (which requires a fee, but can be requested in the extension period)".
London here and here
After London here
London Agreement latest news London Agreement latest news Reviewed by Jeremy on Friday, February 15, 2008 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.