Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / defences / interoperability / trade mark / USA / A weighty trade mark issue for the US courts

A weighty trade mark issue for the US courts

- , , ,

The IPKat has learned from Reuters that Weight Watchers is suing Nestle for trade mark infringement in the District Court of Southern New York. Weight Watchers claims that Nestle has displayed trade marks relating to Weight Watchers and its points system on its Skinny Cow ice creams and Lean Cuisine ready meals. Weight Watchers fears that this may confuse consumers into thinking that it has endorsed Nestle's products. Nestle meanwhile runs its own weightloss programme, Jenny Craig Inc.

This looks to the IPKat like a rather unconventional interoperability case. Can you use someone else's trade mark to tell them that you food fits into their diet programme? Even if you can, should you do it in a way which doesn't cause confusion?
A weighty trade mark issue for the US courts A weighty trade mark issue for the US courts Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, September 17, 2009 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousFriday, 18 September 2009 at 09:33:00 GMT+1

    WW went after Tesco (who themselves have an independent diet programme) some years ago for referring to WW & their "Points" trade mark. Both M&S and Tesco now still refer to WW on their low fat food packaging with a simple statement that the product is not WW endorsed so this will surely settle?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amarjit Singh KullarTuesday, 22 September 2009 at 18:12:00 GMT+1

    I agree with the previous reader. The advertisement is just for marketing only. That does have little impact for profit. But if the quality is good, then the market will go up.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.