"I was hoping that you could help us raise awareness within the IP community about a consultation we are undertaking at Nominet.Says the IPKat, it's good to see these domains freed up -- and Nominet has taken the right approach in seeking consultation. He hopes that not only British interests and stake-holders will respond but also readers from any other jurisdictions which may have done the same thing, so we can learn from them. Merpel wonders whether "w" counts as one letter or two ...
Nominet currently prohibits the registration of one-character and two-letter domain names within the second level domains it controls, including .co.uk and .org.uk. As this restriction was due to technical reasons which no longer apply, we are planning to release approximately 2,000 domain names for registration, initially via a sunrise period for trade mark holders.
We are seeking public comments before formally announcing the release process. Full details of the consultation can be found here.
We are currently in the process of writing to trade mark holders with trade marks which are the same as to the domain names being released (i.e. "AA" to "ZZ", "0" to "9" and "A" to "Z") to encourage them to respond to the consultation. I was hoping that you could also spread the word among your readers, as we'd like to hear from them (and their clients). The consultation runs until 8 June 2010".
1 comment:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html
I wonder who will be first to get "ip.co.uk". The likely candidates seem to be:
ReplyDeletehttp://ipconsulting.eu/
http://www.carratu.com/
http://www.lincoln-ip.com/