Update: Beyoncé's pirated bikini

As the IPKat has reported earlier, Triumph (the underwear manufacturer) obtained an interim injunction against Sony Music in Germany, enjoining Sony from further distributing Beyoncé's music video for the "Video Phone" song (see below; noooo, this post is not just an excuse for re-running the sexy footage).

Bardehle Pagenberg has posted the full text of the decision of the Munich court upholding the ex parte injunction, which answers some of the questions commentators raised with regards to the last post. Namely, commentators wondered whether Triumph had relied on copyright (as reported in the news media) or on an (unregistered) Community design.

I turns out the media were correct for once; Triumph indeed relied solely on a copyright claim.

The court notes that fashion designs are in principle protected by copyright law (as works of applied art), but in most specific cases, courts denied protection for lack of individual character (p. 8 of the decision). In the case at hand, however, the design of the bikini by Iskren Lozanov (pictured above right) was so unusual and original that there was no doubt about its quality as a protectable work in the sense of art. 2(2) German Copyright Act. The bikini worn by Beyoncé in the music video was a derivative work as the characteristics of Lozanow's design remain clearly recognizable.

As Henning Hartwig notes on Class99, this case will almost certainly go all the way up.

Update: Beyoncé's pirated bikini Update: Beyoncé's pirated bikini Reviewed by Mark Schweizer on Monday, May 03, 2010 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. There is a certain element of irony when starting the video, only to get the error message that it is withdrawn due to rights held by Sony Music Entertainment.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.