Fix Copyright! group set up to ask you how to review EU copyright

Burt could not wait to open
 his Christmas present
Via a most precious Katfriend comes the news that a new interest group - called Fix Copyright! and composed of a large number of interest groups from across Europe, ranging from rights holders to public interest NGOs to large consumer representatives and everything in between - has just been launched.

Fix Copyright! believes in balanced copyright laws that encourage community participation, facilitate economic growth and spur innovation. It supports:
Joy! It was a Fix Copyright!
membership card
  • Flexible copyright exceptions that enable innovation;
  • Fair and proportionate liability for copyright infringement;
  • Equitable access to information for educators, libraries, cultural institutions and the wider community;
  • Fair and proportionate incentives for creators
Fix Copyright! is against:
  • Copyright laws that distort the balance between the interests of rights holders and broader public interest in access to knowledge;
  • The use of technological or contractual measures to unfairly restrict access to content.
The group was set up following the launch of EU Commission's Public Consultation on the review of EU copyright rules (here), and is seeking YOUR responses to the questions posed therein. You can have your voice heard simply by following this link

UPDATE: The website is still under construction, so check it out again in a few days' time!
Fix Copyright! group set up to ask you how to review EU copyright Fix Copyright! group set up to ask you how to review EU copyright Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati on Thursday, December 26, 2013 Rating: 5


  1. My response would be to leave out the words "fair" and "unfair" when setting limits of rights and access.

    Talk about your loaded words...

  2. Hmm... I'm not sure that "fair" and "unfair" are particularly loaded in this context. Rather, they indicate an assumption of commonsense which in my view is too often disregarded.

    It's a truism that legislation which doesn't conform to some idea of "fairness" is doomed to failure.


All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.