The team is joined by GuestKats Mirko Brüß, Rosie Burbidge, Nedim Malovic, Frantzeska Papadopolou, Mathilde Pavis, and Eibhlin Vardy
InternKats: Rose Hughes, Ieva Giedrimaite, and Cecilia Sbrolli
SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Hayleigh Bosher (Book Review Editor), and Tian Lu (Asia Correspondent).

Tuesday, 17 December 2013

The BRG needs you! ... to comment on ICANN's proposed changes to the Registry Agreement for the new TLDs for the .brand Registries

The IPKat has been contacted by the ever-industrious trade mark enthusiast Sarah Walker (Reckitt Benckiser) to alert our readers to the period that ICANN has set for public comments to the proposed changes to the Registry Agreement for the new TLDs in respect of the .brand Registries.

As in-house trade mark attorney and in her capacity as member of the Board of the Brand Registry Group (BRG), Sarah has kindly summarised the proposed changes to the Registry Agreement from a .brand perspective (as issued by the BRG).  More information and background can be found here.  Changes would be made to allow the owner of a .brand TLD to:
  1. use a single trusted Registrar (clause 2.9). This change will allow trade mark owners who have applied for new TLDs to promote and maintain trust in their .Brand Registries.
  2. have the option to object to the re-delegation of their .brand TLD during a 2 year “cooling off” period (clause 4.5). This would allow the .Brand to avoid any risk of consumer confusion or any other unintended collision consequences after the winding down of the Registry. This cooling off period would not prohibit a third party making an application for the TLD in the interim.
  3. be exempt from the Code of Conduct (Specification 9) provided the Registry meets the requirements of a .Brand TLD (under Specification 13). .Brands would instead be contractually obliged to conduct internal reviews at least annually (which certified reviews would be submitted to ICANN, and which may be made publicly available) and to inform ICANN if any change of circumstances would cause them to no longer meet the .Brand definition. In the event that a .Brand registry ceased to meet the definition, then Specification 13 would no longer apply.
The period for public comment is currently open but already closes on 9 January 2014. The BRG would welcome support from brand owners in relation to this proposal. Please click here if you would like to comment on ICANN's website.

Merpel's only comment is that the 9 January 2014 deadline for submitting comments is a bit ungenerous, seeing how many days of public holiday and private debauchery there are between now and then.

If any owners of a .brand TLD are interested in joining the BRG, they are encouraged to email the BRG Director General Philip Sheppard: outreach[at]

No comments:

Subscribe to the IPKat's posts by email here

Just pop your email address into the box and click 'Subscribe':