Is a revision of AGCOM Copyright Regulation on the agenda? Commissioner Barnier speaks

Merpel usually prefers to have a kiss 
on her lips,
rather than comments
on AGCOM Regulation
Yesterday these Kats were delighted to make available in exclusive for this blog’s readers the mysterious letter that the EU Commission sent to the Italian Communication Authority (AGCOM), shortly before this adopted its Regulation on Online Copyright Enforcement [on which see here and here; unofficial English translation is available here].

Further to this Katscoop, the EU Commission’s [and Merpel’s] comments on the Regulation have been on everyone’s lips [here, here, here]

"Why has the letter remained unpublished for such a long time?", some people asked, while others wondered whether the final text of the Regulation complies with the points that the Commission raised in its letter, notably ensuring that the right of defence is duly safeguarded.
A few hours ago, Mr Michel Barnier, EU Commissioner for the Internal Market and Services, took position in relation to the letter exposed by IPKat these points. 
Looking forward to a new version
of AGCOM Regulation?
While answering a question of a journalist from ANSA (the Italian foremost press agency), Commissioner Barnier said that AGCOM Regulation “is compliant with the EU law framework”, although the Commission “actually has some questions and details to verify”. He concluded by saying that that the Commission “is working on these with the Italian authorities”.
Merpel thought that the Regulation AGCOM enacted on 12 December last was the final version, also considering that Article 18 of the Regulation itself states that amendments are possible, but only after its entry into force, ieon the basis of the experience that has resulted from its application, as well as technological development and market evolution”.
Hence, she innocently wonders whether Commissioner Barnier's statement means that the last word on AGCOM Regulation has not been spoken yet ... and AGCOM and the Commission are (already) working to revise the Regulation ... even before it enters into force [that should be on 31 March 2014]?
Is a revision of AGCOM Copyright Regulation on the agenda? Commissioner Barnier speaks Is a revision of AGCOM Copyright Regulation on the agenda? Commissioner Barnier speaks Reviewed by Unknown on Thursday, January 16, 2014 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.