Even Kats like to acquire some new skills ... |
Around the weblogs. Until very recently, this Kat was unaware of IP.NEWS, the Belgian bloggie brainchild of Axel Beelen. You can sample it here (by the way, it's in French). Good luck Axel, say the Kats, we do like your origami bird logo (left). Elsewhere, Art & Artifice started its 2014 blogging with "Tax exempt artworks: a "racket in urgent need of reform"?", a neat post by art-expert-turned-tax-lawyer Liz Emerson. On Class 99 Hossain Badamchi gifts the blog with a story of how Lindt saved its packaging from a predatory design registrant in Iran by dint of its earlier trade mark registration, while blog founder David Musker muses on the problems of downloading Community design registration certificates. In an open letter on the jiplp weblog, Julian Cockbain asks whether the European Patent Office's facility for petitioning to review non-kosher Board of Appeal decisions is actually a Norwegian parrot. On the 1709 Blog, we read a lament from veteran Polish DJ Yahu Pawul that copyright collecting societies are persecuting his species. Finally, on IP Finance, fellow Kat Neil considers the economics of the cinema and who or what theatres are actually competing against.
The Institute of Trade Mark Attorneys (ITMA) in the United Kingdom is letting it be known that "Media, Pop Culture and the Law", the organisation's Spring Conference, will soon be upon us. This year it runs from 19 to 21 March, in the lovely city of London. Although it's billed as a Spring Conference, the weather has been a bit hit-and-miss in recent times, so registrants are strongly advised to bring their own springs. For further details, including special Super Early Bird reductions in the registration fees that finish on Friday 10 January, just click here.
Monday miscellany
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, January 06, 2014
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html