![]() |
| Finding Stockholm wasn't so hard but, try as she might, Gina couldn't locate that Brewery ... |
On the subject of forthcoming events, let's not forget the Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property monthly list of events for March, which you can peruse here. If nothing else, this shows that the number of IP events coming up seems to be very much on the increase.
Better late than never. It seems that the Court of Justice of the European Union's Translation Unit has finally managed to catch up with itself. This Kat learns that the English language versions of Advocate General Bot’s Opinions in Cases C-146/13 Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament, Council of the European Union and C-147/13 Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union were finally made publicly available last Thursday. These Opinions, delivered on 18 November of last year, deal with such sensitive topics as the use of the enhanced cooperation mechanism for the establishment of a unitary patent system, the question of effective control of a non-EU institution, non-discrimination and judicial review. For a summary of the issues raised and the Advocate General's take on them, see this earlier Katpost here
Fashion event in Soho. Katfriend Tania Phipps-Rufus writes to tell this Kat that she is hosting an event at Condé Nast College of Fashion, 16–17 Greek Street, Soho. Perhaps unsurprisingly the subject is "Fashion, Law & Business", and there is a particular focus on intellectual property as it affects the fashion sector. The event will be on 18 March at 6.30 - 8.30pm. Tickets for the event are available here. There are Super Early Bird and presumably ordinary Early Bird reductions for early registrants but, since the very most it can cost you even if you miss all the deadlines is only £20, it sounds agreeably affordable.
Around the weblogs. Always full of surprises, Mark Anderson's IP Draughts explains why, if you are looking to register a company name, you can register "OMG F**K :–) Limited" straight off but need permission before you can register "Sheffield University Patent Licensing Institute". IP Finance hosts a request to participate in a short survey on patent ownership being run by Aistemos. On SOLO IP, Barbara Cookson points out that the OHIM Board of Appeal decision in Canal Plus, designed to prevent unused marks being used to oppose later registrations, does not yet seem to part of UK law.
Reviewed by Jeremy
on
Monday, March 02, 2015
Rating:






Dear IP Kat
ReplyDeleteIf I am not mistaken, you implied "not in England" means "non-UK".
We have just had St David's day, and Burn's night. St Patricks Day (I presume this is celebrated in NI) is just around the corner.
Shame on you (and me - I used to do the same in my youth).
As a penance, perhaps you (or you could ask your readers) should list all the territories associated with the UK, or which use UK law, or are based on UK law!
(The reason I ask is - I just found out Guadaloupe is part of France - and wondered if there were any other territories like that associated with the UK (where UK IP rights might apply).
And I have always wondered about oil rigs!
Thanks, Anonymous. I should have said "even non-UK events".
ReplyDeleteNaturally this is not my mistake, though. I was merely reporting the mistaken mindset of some of my readers.