Look, I figured out how to use GIF! |
A chapter entitled, "A Stakeholder Perspective on Heritage Branding and Digital Communication," [Merpel loves a good academic title] by Adriaan De Man and Cristiana Oliveira, examines value creation in the cultural industries. The authors paint archeological museums as key centres to regions both culturally and economically as they help develop a regional brand and create an, "archeological trademark." However, online social media has generated a second sphere of influence and marketing. The museum is now a, "mediator, authenticating contents and providing credibility" as it engages with bloggers and online networks creating branding, and value, for a region.
Cat Culture cirdub |
This book is unlikely to find its way onto the bookshelves of most IPKat readers, but highlights that our legalistic focus on IP, and innovation in general, is set in a wider context. Tourism and cultural industries are huge economic sectors (particularly in smaller countries) and demonstrate the importance of debates in traditional knowledge, cultural heritage and geographical indications.
Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation (2016), edited by Vicky Katsoni and Anastasia Stratigea, published by Springer, IBSN 978-3-319-27528-4, 625 pages, is available as an e-book for USD$129 and in hardcover for USD$169.
Book Review: Tourism and Culture in the Age of Innovation
Reviewed by Nicola Searle
on
Sunday, April 10, 2016
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html