Filed your Article 28 Declarations? You may have to do them again...
 |
| The key IP news stories from last week in one handy package |
The EUIPO has recently moved the goalposts on Article 28 and everyone who has reviewed portfolios and filed Article 28 declarations may need to redo the job. Former Guest Kat Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons explains.
Costs of ISP blocking injunctions: is there really an EU rule?
Does EU law support the court's decision that ISPs rather than rightsholders should pay should pay the costs of a blocking injunction? Eleonora Rosati brings you up to speed with the Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier.
Friday Fantasies
Costs of ISP blocking injunctions: is there really an EU rule?
Does EU law support the court's decision that ISPs rather than rightsholders should pay should pay the costs of a blocking injunction? Eleonora Rosati brings you up to speed with the Court of Appeal judgment in Cartier.
Friday Fantasies
News roundup from Nick Smallwood: IPWeek Singapore, IP & international investment law, US inaugurates Anti-Counterfeiting Month, NZ Trans-Tasman Patent Attorneys (Amendment) Bill & Report from the Case Management Hearing on the legal challenges to Brexit.
Patent Litigation as a branding tool: Huawei v Samsung
Claim and counterclaim in Huawei v Samsung. Neil Wilkof ponders the extent to which brand recognition is a factor in this latest edition of the smartphone wars.
Hospira v Genentech: revocation of patents confirmed on appeal
Birss J, at first instance, found that it was obvious to screen a particular selection of possible drug formulations to determine which is most stable. Darren Smyth explains why this decision was upheld on appeal.
BREAKING: Mr Justice Arnold refers questions on Article 3(b) SPC Regulation to CJEU
The Amerikat brings you exciting end of term news from the Patents Court.
Book Review: Trade Secret Protection
Nicola Searle says this book will appeal to the reader eager to access synopses of trade secret protection in key jurisdictions, and in particular non-English speaking ones where information may be less readily accessible.
Gotta catch 'em all without infringing copyright: Pokémon and Freedom of Panorama
Players who catch Pokémon in front of copyright protected sculptures and buildings in countries which do not have Freedom of Panorama, and take a photograph of their capture, are infringing copyright. Emma Perot explains.
Patent Litigation as a branding tool: Huawei v Samsung
Claim and counterclaim in Huawei v Samsung. Neil Wilkof ponders the extent to which brand recognition is a factor in this latest edition of the smartphone wars.
Hospira v Genentech: revocation of patents confirmed on appeal
Birss J, at first instance, found that it was obvious to screen a particular selection of possible drug formulations to determine which is most stable. Darren Smyth explains why this decision was upheld on appeal.
BREAKING: Mr Justice Arnold refers questions on Article 3(b) SPC Regulation to CJEU
The Amerikat brings you exciting end of term news from the Patents Court.
Book Review: Trade Secret Protection
Nicola Searle says this book will appeal to the reader eager to access synopses of trade secret protection in key jurisdictions, and in particular non-English speaking ones where information may be less readily accessible.
Gotta catch 'em all without infringing copyright: Pokémon and Freedom of Panorama
Players who catch Pokémon in front of copyright protected sculptures and buildings in countries which do not have Freedom of Panorama, and take a photograph of their capture, are infringing copyright. Emma Perot explains.
Never too late 106 [week ending on Sunday 24 July] | Innovation & IPRs in China & India: Book Review | Paris Tribunal rejects request to filter 'torrent' searches on Bing | Red colour mark reinstated in Germany | Update on Napp v Dr Reddy & Sandoz Litgation | Patent jurisdiction tussle in Rhodia v Molycorp | Decision on ISP liability from Rome | Copyright in the Animal Kingdom
Never too late 105 [week ending on Sunday 17 July] High Court rejects Seretide combination colour mark in Glaxo v Sandos | Conference report: Should you arbitrate FRAND terms? | Friday Foghorn, including UK IPO invitation for IP valuation research bids
Never too late 104 [week ending on Sunday 10 July] e-Sport in the French Digital Republic Bill | Aspartame is back -- and is Pepsi playing by a new branding playbook| The USPTO moves to clear "Trademark Deadwood" | Court of Appeal of England and Wales confirms availability of blocking injunctions in online trade mark cases | An opportunity for IP scholars seeking future careers | CJEU says that operators of physical marketplaces may be forced to stop trade mark infringements of market-traders | Book review: the law and practice of trade mark transactions | Own name defence in Singapore| Cartier rapid response event | AG Wathelet on out of print books | Maccoffee: McDonalds not loving it
Never too late 103 [week ending on Sunday 3 July] | Publicity Rights v First Amendment | EU Trade marks Article 28 Declarations | Non-EU UK in the UPC? | Book review: IP Strategy, Valuation and Damages | Brexit and Copyright | In memoriam of David Goldring | Openness, innovation and patents
Never too late 102 [week ending on Sunday 26 June] | Neighbouring rights for publishers | US Supreme Court makes it easier to obtain patent enhanced damages | US Supreme Court in Halo and Kirtsaeng makes IP victory sweeter for successful parties | Enlarged Board publishes decision: EPO President violated judicial independence | Dear Europe... UK leaves the EU | Dear UK...
Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week
Reviewed by Nick Smallwood
on
Monday, August 01, 2016
Rating:
Reviewed by Nick Smallwood
on
Monday, August 01, 2016
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Thou shalt not discriminate the Lego block over any other kind of product – GRUR speaks out on C-211/24](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgWJYQUJNvYydrZcjwSHPuxd14xX3_48aBusHKBogY-Wg1BPSJSABbFFjmGiUV3aqG2npP9xYaIl1vtWK5AsqGOQPgRD2TWFLhyyc4xGm1fHDD-tt9kHcrSSgAyju2P9wSKz0VW6h7D5MD4Hxd9vREyxKYzlMRNXxxtxc3DiNsXppfVaxgSxAMV/s72-c/21742619125_7c9e53cd39_o.png)
![[Guest post] Comparison of wine and gin: the EUIPO’s unquestionable Similarity Tool](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiNfTEBXiPVS0XjZi4mNE1OtXLxXiEp1PUgcUK7MMMXlfyTkO5SMXv-VCMXXNdS_F1XdMMxYca1VbBTGvvDeTVpo5x-5YwR7atQJmK3x32T8LACpf4308kht3nEtaxPwEPcGGrB0s5xjGktmQPOiVwPVLRO5JbW19qupc7xUtiVutvaWHow0OpBkA/s72-c/Picture%201.jpg)
![[Guest post] Muddying the waters of copyright – a rapid reaction to today’s IPEC decision which sees the sinking of the WaterRower’s claims for copyright protection](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEh7chFANC7ppmZl4_nlR6_hZEcg6cOhVEJNVXqki4p82BoVlcLFotuOXzHWYD5lKLiiK_kRoWeXmJjjaV2DpoKsAWq8U3LFioO5W_841a9gcfDIFjvZWcGqfnr0jWJNtyXptIYR_8bxCssaDkJ9KMokuSqy1g65Il7p2hPwo4MfRCEGoUPQJesvbg/s72-w400-c-h189/Screenshot%202024-11-11%20at%2018.20.45.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html