Wednesday Whimsies

You shall go to the ball..
1. The UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has published externally commissioned research looking into the demand for UK trade mark applications and renewals. UK Trade Mark Demand: An Analysis was carried out by the University of the West of England and Belmana Ltd. Due to an increase in trade mark applications, the IPO identified the need to forecast future trade mark applications to plan resource allocations. The report describes recent trends in trade mark registration and forecast results for 2017.

2. WIPO Director General Francis Gurry has welcomed an independent contribution by the Australian Government that has reinvigorated a fund supporting the participation of the world’s indigenous peoples in international negotiations hosted at WIPO, stating: “Australia’s donation underscores its dedication to ensuring that the voices of indigenous and local communities are delivered in person here at WIPO…”

3. This year's IP Ball will be held at the De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms, Holborn, London, on Saturday 15th July, and all IP professionals are welcomed.

4. Readers have no doubt been keeping up to date with the GS Media saga here. Tito Rendas (Catholic University of Portugal) examines the GS Media judgment in a recent publication How Playboy Photos Compromised EU Copyright Law: The GS Media Judgment, available here.

5. Interested in intellectual property in the fashion industry? The Fashion Law Masterclass takes place on Friday, 24 March 2017 at the Condé Nast College of Fashion & Design, 16-17 Greek Street, London.
Wednesday Whimsies Wednesday Whimsies Reviewed by Hayleigh Bosher on Wednesday, March 15, 2017 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.