If you are interested in exploring and discussing the IP implications of what is 'more than just a game', ie interactive entertainment, you may want to check the programme of this year's edition of what has become a popular event at Queen Mary in London.
Organised by Dr Gaetano Dimita and part of the Fringe of the London Game festival, More Than Just a Game is said to be "the only international academic-led conference on Interactive Entertainment and Intellectual Property Law."
According to its organiser, "the conference is a well-established platform to exchange ideas, discuss challenges, explore solutions and map the legal issues that must be addressed for a more appropriate understanding, promotion and protection of interactive entertainment."
The main theme of the 2017 edition conference, which will take place at Stationer's Hall in London on 6 and 7 April, is Virtual and Augmented Reality.
For further information and registrations, just click here.
Organised by Dr Gaetano Dimita and part of the Fringe of the London Game festival, More Than Just a Game is said to be "the only international academic-led conference on Interactive Entertainment and Intellectual Property Law."
According to its organiser, "the conference is a well-established platform to exchange ideas, discuss challenges, explore solutions and map the legal issues that must be addressed for a more appropriate understanding, promotion and protection of interactive entertainment."
The main theme of the 2017 edition conference, which will take place at Stationer's Hall in London on 6 and 7 April, is Virtual and Augmented Reality.
For further information and registrations, just click here.
More Than Just a Game - 2017 edition
Reviewed by Eleonora Rosati
on
Wednesday, March 01, 2017
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html