Beware the special requirements of software protection in Brazil


IPKat has long observed that IP law in Brazil will sometimes adopt a sui generis approach to an issue, especially at the administrative level, which makes it imperative that IP practitioners be fully aware of the particular requirements under Brazilian law. The protection of computer software is a notable example, especially with respect to issues of registration and secrecy. Kat friend Thereza Curi of the Kasznar Leonardos law firm discusses the most recent development in this regard against the existing legal and administrative background.

"IP protection of computer software in Brazil is governed by Law nº 9.609, of February 19, 1998. Strictly speaking, it is independent of registration, because the protection that it provides derives from the local copyright law, under which registration is not mandatory but rather is merely optional and declaratory in nature. However, in case of any judicial dispute related to the question of ownership, the registration may be used as relevant proof of ownership. The public body responsible for registration of software in Brazil is the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office, ("BPTO").

The term of software protection in Brazil is 50 years, counted from January 1st of the year following its publication or, in the absence of publication, counted from the date of its creation. At the time of registration, the applicant may also request before the BPTO that the software be filed under secrecy. In such a case, the documentation filed at the Office cannot be disclosed, except if requested either by a court or by the registrant itself. Should the software already have been registered in any other country that is a signatory to the Berne Convention, a new registration in Brazil will not be necessary, since foreign registration in such countries is recognized in Brazil. In case a foreign applicant wishes to license or commercialize its software within Brazilian territory, it is also exempted from registration.

Maintenance of secrecy is solely the responsibility of the applicant. Previously, such secrecy needed to be updated every 10 years. Currently, when the registration is made on a confidential basis, it remains valid for the total 50- year term, without the need for renewal.Against this backdrop, the BPTO issued on September 1, 2017, Normative Instruction Nº 074, which came into force on September 12, 2017. The Instruction establishes new procedures regarding the registration of software and use of the electronic form called e-RPC.

Concerning the changes in the registration system, the following can be highlighted: a completely electronic process, implementation of a hash digital summary as a safer way to protect the software, electronic signature of documents and changes in the Official Taxes Schedule for software services.The cryptographic function hash is an algorithm normally used to guarantee the fully integrity of an electronic document. Therefore, a technical expert can prove there was no modification in the document, since it was turned from source code into hash. Previously, the applicant had to send the entire source code of the software; now, the BPTO requires only a hash digital summary of its most relevant and important parts in order to identify the computer program.

The new electronic process basically consists of the issuance of an Official Tax Receipt (“GRU” – the Guia de Recolhimento da União, is a document that was established by the Brazilian Treasury Department and used in order to make payments to organizations, funds, governmental bodies, foundations and other entities) that will generate a Declaration of Veracity. Said Declaration must be completely filled out (note that this form follows previous one, requiring information about the holder to title of the software, the author and the software itself), and is to be submitted along with a power of attorney.

Hence, from now on, all documentation must be electronically signed, being mandatory for obtaining a digital Certificate for a Brazilian applicant. Should the applicant be domiciled abroad, it will be necessary to appoint a qualified attorney, domiciled in Brazil and duly authorized to represent such applicant, including the power to receive judicial summons.Finally, is important to emphasize that BPTO also changed its Official Tax Schedule, reducing its scope of services and standardizing the rates of all software service – except for the item “lifting of confidentiality request”, for which the Official Tax was increased."

Photo at lower left is by Anjuta team and is licensed under GNU Free Documentation License
Beware the special requirements of software protection in Brazil Beware the special requirements of software protection in Brazil Reviewed by Neil Wilkof on Wednesday, November 08, 2017 Rating: 5

3 comments:

  1. By Helmar Alvares (Head of Software and Integrated Circuit Topography Division)

    An excellent article presented by Thereza, clearly and in a few lines, the author describes the main features of the new model adopted by the patent office [1], after September 11.

    However, the new model fully guarantees the secrecy of the protected software and the office [1] only registers the hash summary of this software, this because the Brazilian courts accept the hash summary as a forensic evidence. This software is kept under the custody of its owner during the time that is necessary, and this can be up to 50 years. The applicant’s choice to maintain the software in secrecy or not was a feature of the old model.

    The new model became simpler and safer through the elimination of the presentation of various supporting documents such as assignment document, company social contract, id card and so on.

    Currently only one document is required: Veracity Statement and if applicable, a Power of Attorney. The Power of Attorney will be presented only once, until this document is revoked by the grantor or waived by the granted. All information presented in the form is declaratory and the Right-Holder will digitally sign the document with an ICP-Brasil digital certificate, which gives legal certainty for the registration of software.

    As the process is totally electronic, simple and automated, it was possible to stablish a lower administrative fee to the services (approx. $65.0) provided by the office [1]. Besides that, the provision of the registration certificate became more agile and could be issued between two and seven days, what was previously done in more than 100 days.

    [1] INPI – Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial

    ReplyDelete
  2. However, the new model fully guarantees the secrecy of the protected software and the office [1] only registers the hash summary of this software, this because the Brazilian courts accept the hash summary as a forensic evidence. This software is kept under the custody of its owner during the time that is necessary, and this can be up to 50 years. The applicant’s choice to maintain the software in secrecy or not was a feature of the old model.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.