Results for
supplementary protection certificates
Veterinary versus human use under Article 3(d): CJEU asked to revisit Santen
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Saturday, January 17, 2026
Rating:
5
[Guest Post] UK SPCs: Clinging to nurse, or fear of something worse? (Merck v Comptroller [2025] EWCA Civ 45)
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Wednesday, February 26, 2025
Rating:
5
UK takes uncompromising approach to interpretation of "the product" under Art. 3(a) SPC Regulation (Newron v Comptroller [2023] EWHC 1471)
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Monday, September 04, 2023
Rating:
5
Transitional provisions for the Windsor Framework: Is Northern Ireland "a new Liechtenstein" for SPCs?
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Monday, July 03, 2023
Rating:
5
What does the Windsor Framework mean for UK SPCs?
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Tuesday, March 07, 2023
Rating:
5
Sweden gets into the Article 3 SPC referral game in AstraZeneca dapagliflozin case
Reviewed by
Henry P Yang
on
Wednesday, March 01, 2023
Rating:
5
A new study on the options for a unified supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) system in Europe!
Reviewed by
Frantzeska Papadopoulou
on
Monday, October 24, 2022
Rating:
5
European Commission consultation on unitary supplementary protection certificates (SPCs)
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Thursday, March 24, 2022
Rating:
5
New SPC referral to the CJEU on the interpretation of Art 3(a) and (c) for combination products (Merck v Clonmel)
Reviewed by
Dr Rose Hughes
on
Monday, March 07, 2022
Rating:
5