* an interview with aeroplane manufacturer Boeing's Robert Gullette on his role at the helm of that company's IP Management Unit;
Left: Boeing's latest design has taken competitors by surprise
* a depressing review - if you're a US patent owner - of the decline in the magnitude of US patent infringement damages during 2006;
* a report by Dick James (an analyst with Chipworks) on the value of "reverse engineering" in IP management and
* yet another piece on the important of due diligence in IP transactions, but a good one - this time from CPA's John Pryor.
Right: the IPKat demonstrates how to be duly diligent
The IPKat remains impressed with IAM's commitment to relevant content and good journalism. Merpel says, it's about time the Europeans had a few more original ideas for IP asset management ...
The Intellectual Property Institute is hosting a seminar in London on Thursday 15 March 2007 on the subject "FMCG Issues". For those of you who either dislike or can't remember acronyms, FMCG = fast-moving consumer goods. The speaker is Evie Kyriakides (Mars).
The event is hosted at the London offices of law firm McDermott Will & Emery (7 Bishopsgate, London EC2N 3AR). Registration (that's a bit like a reception, but with no guarantee of drinks) starts at 4.30pm. Evie gets introduced at 5.00pm and speaks from 5.15pm to 6.00pm (questions and chairman's closing remarks), followed by refreshments (that's a bit like registration but without having your name checked off the list). Entry fee for IPI Members £20.00, for Non-Members £50.00. Students go FREE. To register, contact Anne Goldstein (Administrator, Intellectual Property Institute, 36 Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3QB, Tel: 020 7436 3040 Fax: 020 7323 5312), sending in your cheque and mentioning the magic word "IPKat".
It's interesting to see the US still at the forefront of innovation for IP asset management.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to be a lot more of a free market compared to the UK, where red tape and costs hinder a lot of the innovation from taking off the ground as successfully.
There's a general view that the US are willing to take more risks and more either make it big, or hit rock bottom.