The IPKat learns from Helsingin Sanomat of a Finnish copyright case. The Finnish Court of Appeals found that Lasihelmi Filmi, producer of ‘Man Exposed’ infringed the copyright of screenwriter Veli-Pekka Hänninen. It appears that the producer had failed in his assignment to ensure that he had sufficient rights to change the screenplay in the way that he wanted to. When the screenwriter refused his later request to make the changes, the producer made them anyway. Said the court:
"transfer of copyright does not include a more extensive right to change the work than what is agreed in the contract".
The IPKat says, it’s common sense, but if you take an assignment or licence, make sure you have the rights to do what you need to in respect of the work in question.
FINNISH COPYRIGHT CASE FINNISH COPYRIGHT CASE Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, February 01, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.