The Trade Marks Registry has issued a Practice Notice (the first of 2007) confirming, but not altering, the correct practice with regard to revocation actions under s.46 of the Trade Marks Act 1994.
For once, the early bird doesn't catch the worm
The gist of it is that, in order for there to be a revocation, the mark in question must have not been used for five complete years. This means that the revocation will only be operative the day AFTER those five years have elapsed. Many applications for revocation incorrectly endeavour to have the mark revoked on the final day of the five year period, but this is a day too early.

The IPKat acknowledges that this is the correct approach, and it’s worthwhile to publicise it, but he wonders how often the extra day makes a practical difference.
Maths! Maths! Reviewed by Anonymous on Sunday, February 11, 2007 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.