Wizards and Fake Scots


India finds eBay (temporarily) liable

The Times reports that JK Rowling has won an injunction against eBay in relation to the sale of unauthorised copies of her Harry Potter novels. The interim injunction was awarded by the High Court in Delhi and is in place until the hearing resumes on 23 May. At issue are Harry Potter ebooks – Rowling has never authorised the conversion of her novels into ebooks.

Rowling’s lawyer argues:
“In Indian copyright law, if the premises of a person is being used for an infringing activity, that person would be liable for that activity…The market is not immune from liability.”
The IPKat says that this decision puts eBay in a difficult position. Policing a system like eBay for every infringing item put up for sale is seemingly an impossible task.


Check mate?

CBC and MaineToday report that a couple from Maine have sued US retailer LL Bean over copyright in a tartan. The tartan was designed in 1964 to represent the state of Maine, but the couple allege that they acquired the rights to it in 1993 and have been manufacturing tartan to the design in 1964. LL Bean has used the tartan for its Americana Tartan Shirt. Said a spokeswoman:
"L.L. Bean holds that tartan was intended as a symbol of the state of Maine, which places it in the public domain to be used by the government to promote Maine in a positive manner," she said. "It was in this spirit that L.L. Bean included the Maine State Tartan in our Americana Tartan Series."
The IPKat says that the idea that anything commissioned by a state authority to promote it is in the public domain is a new one on him. Aside from anything else, it would do considerable violence to Art.6ter of the Paris Convention.
Wizards and Fake Scots Wizards and Fake Scots Reviewed by Unknown on Monday, February 26, 2007 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. If you mean state as in nation state, section 105 of the US copyright code prevents the Federal government from having a copyright on works it creates. States as in Maine can and do have copyright to their works. Sounds like LLBean confused the federal rule with the state rule.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Copyright over Tartan? Is that even possible? Further, several government departments have logos and emblems that they use to identify themselves. Those clearly are not in the public domain.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.