Ananova cites the Herald Sun as reporting that Andre van der Linden, an Australian evangelical Christian, is suing the Channel 7 TV channel after it ran an episode of Prime Suspect in which the words "Jesus Christ" were used as an exclamation. Van der Linden, of Waranga (northern Victoria) is suing because he says such use of the name is insulting and disrespectful to Christians: "It is high time that television stations like yours be called to account for your defamation of the name Jesus Christ, a practice that insults hundreds of thousands of Christian believers". He adds that blasphemous words should be "bleeped out". Channel 7 proposes to defend the legal action, maintaining that the British-made TV show is a realistic reflection of day-to-day life.

JESUS has been registered in the Benelux countries, Austria, France, Italy and Spain but not (so far) in Germany, Switzerland, China, Hungary or Ireland.

The IPKat notes that Basic Trademark's application to register JESUS in the UK as a trade mark for clothing and footwear was refused last year but is currently under appeal. Although the reason for refusing registration is that the use of JESUS is deemed to be morally offensive to the public (as Mr van der Linden maintains), refusal of registration does not mean that the word can't be used for morally offensive activities such as identifying a brand of jeans.

More on naughty words here, here, here and here
Swearing: Jesus' view
Can't find God? Visit the UK Trade Marks Registry here and here

ECCE HOMO ECCE HOMO Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, April 21, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.