The BBC reports that a new lunar mineral has been discovered in a lunar meterorite that crashed into the Earth in 2000. The mineral has been named hapkeite after the scientist, Bruce Hapke, who predicted the existence of the iron and silicon compound on the Moon 30 years ago. It is claimed that hapkeite is probably made when tiny particles impact the Moon at very high speeds, say Mahesh Anand and his colleagues (their investigation of meteorite Dhofar 280 is reported in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences).

The formation of rocky debris and soil on the surfaces of airless bodies in space involves processes that are virtually non-existent on Earth. This "space weathering", as scientists call it, includes the impact of micro-meteorites which crush and pulverise surface rocks on a minute scale. The micro-meteorites are about 0.1mm or less in diameter but, because of their velocities (they reputedly travel at about 100,000km/h), they carry a great deal of energy that is transferred to their tiny areas of impact. The impacted surface is "flash-melted", vapourising metals and causing chemical and structural changes.

The IPKat recalls that matter that is found in nature is incapable of being patented, since it has the status of a discovery rather than an invention. Since it fell to Earth only in 2000, hapkeite cannot be said to form part of the traditional knowledge base of Oman, where it was found. Will this lack of IP interest result in any lack of enthusiasm in exploiting the commercial possibilities that hapkeite might possess, he wonders.

Merchandising of moon rock here
Moon rock here, here and here

NEW LUNAR MINERAL, SAME OLD IP PROBLEMS? NEW LUNAR MINERAL, SAME OLD IP PROBLEMS? Reviewed by Jeremy on Wednesday, April 28, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.