IT'S NOT TOO LATE ... tell the Commission what you think about the European Commission's proposal to link Community registered designs to the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement (if you need an explanation of this, take a look at the WIPO link below). The idea of making the link is to bring down the administrative costs involved in securing international design protection. You can make your views felt by completing the Commission's electronic survey by not later than this Friday, 30 April.

In a message to its members, European trade mark owners' organisation MARQUES says: "As a brand owners organisation, MARQUES favours simple and cost effective registration systems. You will recall that MARQUES supported the accession of the EU to the Madrid Protocol, and we would be in favour of this link too. It will again increase the flexibility of the registration systems offering protection for IP rights. With a link between the two systems in place, it would not be unrealistic to hope that more countries will join the international registration system and thus making it truly useful".

The IPKat wonders who will object -- and why.

Why WIPO says "vote yes to Hague"

IT'S NOT TOO LATE ... IT'S NOT TOO LATE ... Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo on Wednesday, April 28, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.