Following his blog on the subject of 17 February 2004, the IPKat was interested to read in The Scotsman that Scottish Courage, the brewers of Newcastle Brown Ale, are definitely going to switch production from Newcastle across the River Tyne to Gateshead. The move will lead to the loss of 110 jobs, but major cost savings are predicted. The changeover raises a tricky legal problem though. Scottish Courage has obtained protection of the term NEWCASTLE BROWN ALE as a geographical indication under EU legislation. Ordinarily, this would stop it from using the name if the product was produced anywhere else. However, Scottish Courage has said it will apply to the EU to have the PGI revoked and foresees no problems with this because it is the only producer of NEWCASTLE BROWN ALE.

The IPKat isn’t sure about this reasoning. PGIs are not meant to be personal property rights, so he’s not sure that they should be revoked at the whim of a single producer. It would in theory be open to other producers to start brewing ale according to the same method in Newcastle, though he notes that NEWCASTLE BROWN ALE is a registered trade mark.

More Scottish courage here, here and here
Gateshead’s beer credentials here and here

NEWKIE TO LEAVE NEWCASTLE, BREWER TO ABANDON GIs NEWKIE TO LEAVE NEWCASTLE, BREWER TO ABANDON GIs Reviewed by Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo on Friday, April 23, 2004 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.