Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / PRISON BRAND BOOMS

PRISON BRAND BOOMS


The Sentinel reports on a brand with a difference. BIG HOUSE PRODUCTS is the brand used for goods made by inmates of Pennsylvania penal institutions. The prisoners make clothing (including the clothing made by the inmates), wooden street furniture, storage items and cleansing products, including clear soap to avoid weapons being hidden in it. The brand generally does not undercut the prices of local businesses, despite the availability of cheap labour.



The IPKat says, this is a mark that can’t be tarnished by its use in an unsavoury context.
PRISON BRAND BOOMS PRISON BRAND BOOMS Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 16, 2005 Rating: 5

2 comments:

  1. AnonymousWednesday, 16 November 2005 at 08:44:00 GMT

    I've heard of captive markets, but this is the first time I've ever heard of a captive supplier ...

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousFriday, 18 November 2005 at 00:03:00 GMT

    "The prisoners make clothing (including the clothing made by the inmates)". Do the prisoners also make the clothing not made by the inmates? My head hurts.

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.