Passionate about IP! Since June 2003 the IPKat has covered copyright, patent, trade mark, designs, info-tech and confidentiality issues from a mainly UK and European perspective. Read, post comments and participate!

The team is Eleonora Rosati, Annsley Merelle Ward and Merpel. E-mail the Kats here!

The team is joined by GuestKats Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot, Jocelyn Bosse, Alessandro Cerri, Anastasiia Kyrylenko, Marcel Pemsel and Anna Maria Stein.

SpecialKats: Verónica Rodríguez Arguijo (TechieKat), Antonios Baris (Book Review Editor), Rose Hughes (PatKat) and Chijioke Okorie (Africa Correspondent).

InternKats: Asude Sena Moya and Söğüt Atilla.
Home / / TRADE MARK TALK AT QUEEN MARY

TRADE MARK TALK AT QUEEN MARY


Next Monday (21 November), trade mark agent Felicity Hide (right) of Boult Wade Tennant will be speaking at Queen Mary IPRI. The session will be at 12.30 to 1.30pm and there is no charge for attending.

Her title is "Can you disclaim a trade mark disclaimer?" and she will be focusing on the recent case of General Cigars v Partagas.

If you'd like to attend, or would like further information email here.
TRADE MARK TALK AT QUEEN MARY TRADE MARK TALK AT QUEEN MARY Reviewed by Anonymous on Tuesday, November 15, 2005 Rating: 5

1 comment:

  1. AnonymousTuesday, 15 November 2005 at 10:06:00 GMT

    Er, isn't it 'trade mark attorney' these days? Naughty Kat!

    ReplyDelete

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Subscribe to: Post Comments ( Atom )
Powered by Blogger.