Following the ECJ’s Praktiker Bau decision, the UK Trade Marks Registry has issued a Practice Amendment Notice, setting out acceptable ways of designating retail services in applications for trade marks.

There will no longer be a need to specify the type of retail services which are being provided (e.g. wholesale, supermarket). However, it will be necessary to specify the types of goods in all cases (e.g. stationery, clothing). While it is sufficient to just describe the type of goods (e.g. footwear), specifying the goods in more detail (e.g. shoes and boots for females) remains an option.

Where these conditions are not met, an objection under section 1(1) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 and/or Rule 8(2)(b) of the Trade Mark Rules may be raised.

The notice also points out that marks consisting of the geographical name of the place in which the retail services take place will normally be rejected under the absolute grounds.

Chapters 5 and 6 of the Registry Work Manual have been altered to reflect this change in practice.

The IPKat reckons that, following Praktiker, there are no big surprises here. However, he wonders what happens when a store decides to begin stocking a new line of goods. Will it have to amend its trade mark specification each time it makes a minor diversification?
UK TRADE MARK PAN FOR RETAIL SERVICES UK TRADE MARK PAN FOR RETAIL SERVICES Reviewed by Anonymous on Wednesday, November 16, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.