US Newswire reports that US Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez has announced a new proposed piece of legislation. The Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2005 will implement stronger forfeiture proceedings, criminalize intellectual property infringement motivated by any type of commercial advantage or private financial gain and increase the possibility of restitution for the “victims” of infringement.

The IPKat thinks that this may be a bit of an overreaction. While IP infringement isn’t a “victimless crime”, as some would suggest, there are existing provisions which criminalise certain forms of infringement. If these aren’t working, growing increasingly more shrill bya increasing the severity of criminal measures isn’t likely to make the situation any better.
TOUGHER US CRIMINAL MEASURES TOUGHER US CRIMINAL MEASURES Reviewed by Anonymous on Thursday, November 10, 2005 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here:

Powered by Blogger.