Crazy trade mark cases from the US of A.
* The Miami Herald reports that the owner of Neiman Barkus, The House of Doggy Style, a pampered pooch store, is being sued for dilution by retailer Neiman Markus. It is also claimed that his neimanbarkuspet.net domain name is an example of cybersquatting. Neiman Markus is seeking damages and an account of profits, but the owner of Neiman Barkus has expressed his determination to fight.
* Businessweek reports that the makers of MARSHMALLOW FLUFF are suing Williams Sonoma. The dispute surrounds the term FLUFFNUTTER, which has been used for a combination of MARSHMALLOW FLUFF and peanut butter. Now however, Williams-Sonoma are producing a chocolate-covered peanut butter candy which is being sold under the FLUFFNUTTER mark.The IPKat says doggy style? fluffnutter? Perhaps these marks have lost something in the transition from US to UK English.
DOGS AND OTHER FLUFF
![DOGS AND OTHER FLUFF]()
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
Rating:
Follow the IPKat on LinkedIn 
![[Guest post] Benelux Office rules on opposition proceedings prepared by ChatGPT](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi29VY0rNNP1Hqyz8RgB47r4q7fhqQfYHxsEbX_RKmT4KU5Y_vg7vB6dsAW91CidjMfJ38klTvD4mMtZb3QmwFPAHaGF88BPttWSbfYvo7UUg7MpFRTNtEjThmG0QaX2qZFFHSnN71i3YQZSBFC0SL7PgkAlme-XH8cSNWRFbOAOuLr_LMOGcImLQ/s72-c/Screenshot%202024-12-04%20at%2020.45.58.png)
Posts
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html