Grumpy Brits head to Spain…
This Friday is British Day at OHIM. Representatives of various British organisations and officials are heading to Alicante to discuss various issues of mutual concern. The full agenda is here and includes e-business, CTMs, CDs, fee management and various administrative matters. High on the agenda are the effect of Pratiker-Bau and overwide goods and services specifications. However, The Lawyer reports that the UK delegation
will fly into Alicante this week to vent frustrations about delays and problems at European trademark registry the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM)and will quiz the OHIMistas about delays in oppositions and appeals and difficulties with online filing.
The IPKat is always amused about the British taking the moral high ground when it comes to efficiency, though we do have a Patent Office that runs like greased lightning.
…while the smart money’s on Singapore
Xinahu reports that today saw the opening of the Diplomatic Conference to adopt the revised WIPO Trademark Law Treaty in Singapore. Many of the revisions are aimed at ensuring that trade mark registration keeps up to date with technological advances, but the IPKat notes that the revisions could have an effect on substantive law, in so far as they call for Member countries to allow the registration of certain non-traditional signs which are difficult to represent graphically.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE MARK GOINGS ON
Reviewed by Anonymous
on
Monday, March 13, 2006
Rating:
No comments:
All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.
It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.
Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html