SINGAPORE TREATY; NEWS FROM TURKMENISTAN


Singapore TLT (as it now seems to be known)

OHIM's Jessica Lewis has drawn the IPKat's attention to a very useful WIPO web page here that features new WIPO documents. It contains confirmation that the Singapore revision of the Trademark Law Treaty has been adopted by the conference by a load of countries listed here. It also has a draft text here and lots more besides. Many thanks, Jessica!


IP's all happening in Turkmenistan

7 June 2006 is a red letter day for IP in Turkmenistan. On that date the Caucasian former USSR republic steps up its commitment to the international community by implementing the Vienna Agreement Establishing an International Classification of the Figurative Elements of Marks, the Nice Agreement Concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks and the Locarno Agreement Establishing an International Classification for Industrial Designs.

But ... it won't be till 7 March 2007 that Turkmenistan implements the Strasbourg Agreement Concerning the International Patent Classification.

Lots about Turkmenistan here
How to make traditional Plov here
What to do in Turkmenistan here
Turkmenistan and human rights here
SINGAPORE TREATY; NEWS FROM TURKMENISTAN SINGAPORE TREATY; NEWS FROM TURKMENISTAN Reviewed by Jeremy on Thursday, March 30, 2006 Rating: 5

No comments:

All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory; they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment.

It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow.

Learn more here: http://ipkitten.blogspot.com/p/want-to-complain.html

Powered by Blogger.